Show Lecture.ExtensibleNotMutable as a slide show.

CS253 Extensible Not Mutable

Extensible, not mutable

• C++ is extensible, not mutable.
• extensible: you can extend the language—you can add functionality.
• mutable: you cannot change the language. 2+2 will always be 4.

Extending

int main() {
    string sin = "Impeached: ";
    string all = sin + 17 + ' ' + 42 + ' ' + 45*2;
    cout << all << '\n';
}

c.cc:3: error: no match for 'operator+' in 'sin + 17' (operand types are 
   'std::__cxx11::string' {aka 'std::__cxx11::basic_string<char>'} and 'int')

That failed, because you can’t use + on a std::string and an int.

Extending

string operator+(const string &s, int n) {
    return s + to_string(n);
}

int main() {
    string sin = "Impeached: ";
    string all = sin + 17 + ' ' + 42 + ' ' + 45*2;
    cout << all << '\n';
}

Impeached: 17 42 90

Hooray! C++ is extensible! I extended the language to include string + int.

For all I know, there’s some obscure (that means something I don’t know) line of the C++ standard that forbids overloading operators with all built-in and std:: operands.

More Extending

class Fraction {
    int top, bot;
  public:
    Fraction(int num, int den) : top(num), bot(den) { }
    double get() const { return top*1.0/bot; }
};

int main() {
    Fraction f(355, 113);
    cout << f << '\n';
}

c.cc:10: error: no match for 'operator<<' in 'std::cout << f' (operand types 
   are 'std::ostream' {aka 'std::basic_ostream<char>'} and 'Fraction')

Of course, that failed. << has no idea what to do with an ostream (output stream) and a Fraction.

More Extending

class Fraction {
    int top, bot;
  public:
    Fraction(int num, int den) : top(num), bot(den) { }
    double get() const { return top*1.0/bot; }
};

ostream & operator<<(ostream &os, const Fraction &f) {
    return os << f.get();
}

int main() {
    Fraction f(355, 113);
    cout << f << '\n';
}

3.14159

• Hooray! I extended the language to include ostream << Fraction.
• Why is operator<< not a method of Fraction?

How operators work

• For an operator to be a method of class Fraction, it must take a Fraction as its left-hand argument.
• It would only take a single explicit argument—the other, implicit, left-hand argument would be *this, the current object.
• In the case of cout << f, the left-hand argument is an ostream.
• You can’t add methods to class ostream.
  • It’s not yours.
  • That class is finished.
• Therefore, in this case, operator<< is not a method; it is, instead, a free function.

Mutation

Consider this surprising result:

cout << "Thursday" + 3;

rsday

• "Thursday" is an array of const char, or a const char *.
• Adding 3 to a pointer moves it forward three items.

I don’t like this. I want it to simply append a "3" to the string. Let’s redefine it!

Futility

string operator+(const char *p, int n) {
    return p + to_string(n);
}

int main() {
    cout << "Thursday" + 3;
}

c.cc:1: error: 'std::__cxx11::string operator+(const char*, int)' must have an 
   argument of class or enumerated type

• That failed; I can’t mutate the language.
• const char * + int is already defined, and I can’t change it.

More Futility

string operator%(const char *p, int n) {
    return p + to_string(n);
}

int main() {
    cout << "Thursday" % 3;
}

c.cc:1: error: 'std::__cxx11::string operator%(const char*, int)' must have an 
   argument of class or enumerated type

• Here, we’re not trying to redefine anything, since "C-string" % 3 isn’t defined, but it still fails.
• One of the operator function arguments must be a user-defined type.
  • The message said that—we just didn’t bother to read it.
  • Maybe it allows new operations to be defined in the core language?